sched/autogroup: Fix 64-bit kernel nice level adjustment
Michael Kerrisk reported: > Regarding the previous paragraph... My tests indicate > that writing *any* value to the autogroup [nice priority level] > file causes the task group to get a lower priority. Because autogroup didn't call the then meaningless scale_load()... Autogroup nice level adjustment has been broken ever since load resolution was increased for 64-bit kernels. Use scale_load() to scale group weight. Michael Kerrisk tested this patch to fix the problem: > Applied and tested against 4.9-rc6 on an Intel u7 (4 cores). > Test setup: > > Terminal window 1: running 40 CPU burner jobs > Terminal window 2: running 40 CPU burner jobs > Terminal window 1: running 1 CPU burner job > > Demonstrated that: > * Writing "0" to the autogroup file for TW1 now causes no change > to the rate at which the process on the terminal consume CPU. > * Writing -20 to the autogroup file for TW1 caused those processes > to get the lion's share of CPU while TW2 TW3 get a tiny amount. > * Writing -20 to the autogroup files for TW1 and TW3 allowed the > process on TW3 to get as much CPU as it was getting as when > the autogroup nice values for both terminals were 0. Reported-by:Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Tested-by:
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1479897217.4306.6.camel@gmx.deSigned-off-by:
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment