- 06 Apr, 2023 6 commits
-
-
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno authored
The DISP_PWM controller's default behavior is to always use register double buffering: all reads/writes are then performed on shadow registers instead of working registers and this becomes an issue in case our chosen configuration in Linux is different from the default (or from the one that was pre-applied by the bootloader). An example of broken behavior is when the controller is configured to use shadow registers, but this driver wants to configure it otherwise: what happens is that the .get_state() callback is called right after registering the pwmchip and checks whether the PWM is enabled by reading the DISP_PWM_EN register; At this point, if shadow registers are enabled but their content was not committed before booting Linux, we are *not* reading the current PWM enablement status, leading to the kernel knowing that the hardware is actually enabled when, in reality, it's not. The aforementioned issue emerged since this driver was fixed with commit 0b5ef342 ("pwm: mtk-disp: Fix the parameters calculated by the enabled flag of disp_pwm") making it to read the enablement status from the right register. Configure the controller in the .get_state() callback to avoid this desync issue and get the backlight properly working again. Fixes: 3f2b1673 ("pwm: mtk-disp: Implement atomic API .get_state()") Signed-off-by:
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Reviewed-by:
Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> Tested-by:
Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com> Tested-by:
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
-
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno authored
If shadow registers usage is not desired, disable that before performing any write to CON0/1 registers in the .apply() callback, otherwise we may lose clkdiv or period/width updates. Fixes: cd4b45ac ("pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support") Signed-off-by:
-
Krzysztof Kozlowski authored
The driver can match only via the DT table so the table should be always used and the of_match_ptr does not have any sense (this also allows ACPI matching via PRP0001, even though it might not be relevant here). This also fixes the following compile error: drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c:245:34: error: ‘stm32_pwm_lp_of_match’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=] for builds with CONFIG_OF=n, CONFIG_PWM_STM32_LP=y and W=1. Signed-off-by:
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Krzysztof Kozlowski authored
The driver can match only via the DT table so the table should be always used and the of_match_ptr does not have any sense (this also allows ACPI matching via PRP0001, even though it might not be relevant here). This also fixes the following compiler warning: drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c:252:34: error: ‘rcar_pwm_of_table’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=] for builds with CONFIG_OF=n, CONFIG_PWM_RCAR=y and W=1. Signed-off-by:
-
Heiner Kallweit authored
Convert Amlogic Meson PWM binding to yaml. Reviewed-by:
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Daniel Golle authored
Since commit 241eab76 ("pwm: mediatek: Add support for MT7986") support for the 2 PWM channels implemented in MediaTek MT7986 SoCs has been added. Also add the compatible string to dt-bindings now that they have been converted to YAML. Acked-by:
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org> Reviewed-by:
-
- 30 Mar, 2023 30 commits
-
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
- 23 Mar, 2023 4 commits
-
-
Thierry Reding authored
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
This is just to ensure that .usage_power is properly initialized and doesn't contain random stack data. The other members of struct pwm_state should get a value assigned in a successful call to .get_state(). So in the absence of bugs in driver implementations, this is only a safe-guard and no fix. Reported-by:
Munehisa Kamata <kamatam@amazon.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230310214004.2619480-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The driver only supports normal polarity. Complete the implementation of .get_state() by setting .polarity accordingly. This fixes a regression that was possible since commit c73a3107 ("pwm: Handle .get_state() failures") which stopped to zero-initialize the state passed to the .get_state() callback. This was reported at https://forum.odroid.com/viewtopic.php?f=177&t=46360 . While this was an unintended side effect, the real issue is the driver's callback not setting the polarity. There is a complicating fact, that the .apply() callback fakes support for inversed polarity. This is not (and cannot) be matched by .get_state(). As fixing this isn't easy, only point it out in a comment to prevent authors of other drivers from copying that approach. Fixes: c375bcba ("pwm: meson: Read the full hardware state in meson_pwm_get_state()") Reported-by:
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230310191405.2606296-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The driver only supports normal polarity. Complete the implementation of .get_state() by setting .polarity accordingly. Fixes: 8aae4b02 ("pwm: sprd: Add Spreadtrum PWM support") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230228135508.1798428-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by:
-
