- 19 Dec, 2024 3 commits
-
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
erp5_core: lowest_value_test and previous_period for WeightedAverage and omit_internal for getMovementHistoryList
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
- 17 Dec, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
- 16 Dec, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
- 05 Dec, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
- 04 Dec, 2024 2 commits
-
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
- 19 Nov, 2024 2 commits
-
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
We should check if this should go to generic erp5
-
- 18 Nov, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
- 16 Nov, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
- 14 Nov, 2024 2 commits
-
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
The Movement history only showed movements for owner Wölfel/WBI. We changed the dialog to additionally group the inventory by owner. Email [Woelfel-dev] Movement history of Product incomplete from Leopold Buschmann-Gräf on 2023-06-19
-
- 10 Nov, 2024 4 commits
-
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
WOELFEL: erp5_property_sheets: add source_section*/destination_section* acquired properties to DefaultSupply
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
- 15 Jan, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
- 23 Oct, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
it can happen that getEffectiveModel does not find a model, this is currently causing activity failures in indexation of transformations. Tolerate errors here because this is not an error but just a sign of invalid user data.
-
- 28 Jun, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
- 24 Jun, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
User is usually interested by last movement in stock, not by several months/years old movement. Thus display first fresh movement, and user could then go to next pages to see oldest movements if needed.
-
- 31 May, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Eteri authored
-
- 17 May, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
- 02 May, 2023 2 commits
-
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
Quantity Split Move solver allows user to select to which delivery quantities should be moved when splitting. If the user did not have access to one of these deliveries the dialog would fail. Therfore we only search for those deliveries which can be accessed by the user.
-
Sebastien Robin authored
The code was assuming that we could have only one quantity divergency per delivery. So improve to support multiple divergencies.
-
- 16 Feb, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Nicolas Wavrant authored
`python` command doesn't exist anymore in most recent distribution and our PASS (theia), but python3 has been available for years now.
-
- 20 Dec, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
-
- 19 Dec, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Eteri authored
erp5_crm: add category business_application/crm form module view erp5_project: add category business_application/project for module view erp5_pdm: add category business_application/pdm for module view
-
- 12 Dec, 2022 2 commits
- 19 Sep, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
The missing workflow resulted in a bug when moving quantities multiple times, first to one delivery, then to another delivery. Then the same solver process with same decision was used as for the first time even if the first delivery was already delivered or movement was deleted. The reason was that Quantity Split Move Solver did not change to succeeded state after solving, so Solver Process did not change to solved state.
-
- 18 Sep, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
There is cases of projects running without price currency defined for every possible third party used in accounting. Thus tolerate that price currency might not be defined.
-
- 14 Sep, 2022 2 commits
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
Sebastien Robin authored
We add getFutureStateSet on DCWorkflow, also add this function to ERP5 Workflows
-
- 15 Jun, 2022 2 commits
-
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
When cleaning up Wendelin from restricted python pandas code (see https://lab.nexedi.com/levin.zimmermann/wendelin/tree/remove-redundant-pandas), it turned out that there was one line still missing in erp5. This missing line caused a failed test in wendelin functional tests: https://erp5js.nexedi.net/#/test_result_module/20220614-1B46817BD/6 Readding the line fixed the test.
-
Roque authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1641
-
- 14 Jun, 2022 3 commits
-
-
Roque authored
-
Julien Muchembled authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This happens in project related task report dialog ( testProjectRelatedTaskReport from erp5_report_renderjs_ui_test:testFunctionalRJSReportLanguage )
-