-[Asking for an exception](#asking-for-an-exception)
-[Bugs](#bugs)
-[Regressions](#regressions)
-[Managing bugs](#managing-bugs)
...
...
@@ -100,135 +91,6 @@ Product Managers must have their proposal for that milestone ready by the 22nd o
This proposal will be shared with Engineering for discussion, feedback, and planning.
The plan for the upcoming milestone must be finalized by the 1st of the month, one week before kickoff on the 8th.
## Feature freeze on the 7th for the release on the 22nd
The feature freeze on the 7th has been discontinued. [Transition period overview](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/release/docs/blob/21cbd409dd5f157fe252f254f3e897f01908abe2/general/deploy/auto-deploy-transition.md#transition)
describes the change to this process. During the transition period, the only guarantee that
a change will be included in the release on the 22nd is if the change has been
deployed to GitLab.com prior to this date.
### Between the 1st and the 7th
These types of merge requests for the upcoming release need special consideration:
***Large features**: a large feature is one that is highlighted in the kick-off
and the release blogpost; typically this will have its own channel in Slack
and a dedicated team with front-end, back-end, and UX.
***Small features**: any other feature request.
It is strongly recommended that **large features** be with a maintainer **by the
1st**. This means that:
* There is a merge request (even if it's WIP).
* The person (or people, if it needs a frontend and backend maintainer) who will
ultimately be responsible for merging this have been pinged on the MR.
It's OK if merge request isn't completely done, but this allows the maintainer
enough time to make the decision about whether this can make it in before the
freeze. If the maintainer doesn't think it will make it, they should inform the
developers working on it and the Product Manager responsible for the feature.
The maintainer can also choose to assign a reviewer to perform an initial
review, but this way the maintainer is unlikely to be surprised by receiving an
MR later in the cycle.
It is strongly recommended that **small features** be with a reviewer (not
necessarily a maintainer) **by the 3rd**.
Most merge requests from the community do not have a specific release
target. However, if one does and falls into either of the above categories, it's
the reviewer's responsibility to manage the above communication and assignment
on behalf of the community member.
Every new feature or change should be shipped with its corresponding documentation
and [structure](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/documentation/structure.html) guides.
Note that a technical writer will review all changes to documentation. This can occur
in the same MR as the feature code, but [if there is not sufficient time or need,
it can be planned via a follow-up issue for doc review](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/documentation/feature-change-workflow.html#1-product-managers-role),
and another MR, if needed. Regardless, complete docs must be merged with code by the freeze.
#### What happens if these deadlines are missed?
If a small or large feature is _not_ with a maintainer or reviewer by the
recommended date, this does _not_ mean that maintainers or reviewers will refuse
to review or merge it, or that the feature will definitely not make it in before
the feature freeze.
However, with every day that passes without review, it will become more likely
that the feature will slip, because maintainers and reviewers may not have
enough time to do a thorough review, and developers may not have enough time to
adequately address any feedback that may come back.
A maintainer or reviewer may also determine that it will not be possible to
finish the current scope of the feature in time, but that it is possible to
reduce the scope so that something can still ship this month, with the remaining
scope moving to the next release. The sooner this decision is made, in
conversation with the Product Manager and developer, the more time there is to
extract that which is now out of scope, and to finish that which remains in scope.
For these reasons, it is strongly recommended to follow the guidelines above,
to maximize the chances of your feature making it in before the feature freeze,
and to prevent any last minute surprises.
### On the 7th
Merge requests should still be complete, following the [definition of done][done].
If a merge request is not ready, but the developers and Product Manager
responsible for the feature think it is essential that it is in the release,
they can [ask for an exception](#asking-for-an-exception) in advance. This is
preferable to merging something that we are not confident in, but should still
be a rare case: most features can be allowed to slip a release.
All Community Edition merge requests from GitLab team members merged on the
freeze date (the 7th) should have a corresponding Enterprise Edition merge
request, even if there are no conflicts. This is to reduce the size of the
subsequent EE merge, as we often merge a lot to CE on the release date. For more
information, see
[Automatic CE->EE merge][automatic_ce_ee_merge] and
[Guidelines for implementing Enterprise Edition features][ee_features].
### After the 7th
Once the stable branch is frozen, the only MRs that can be cherry-picked into
the stable branch are:
* Fixes for [regressions](#regressions) where the affected version `xx.x` in `regression:xx.x` is the current release. See [Managing bugs](#managing-bugs) section.
* Fixes for security issues.
* Fixes or improvements to automated QA scenarios.
*[Documentation improvements](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/documentation/workflow.html) for feature changes made in the same release, though initial docs for these features should have already been merged by the freeze, as required.
* New or updated translations (as long as they do not touch application code).
* Changes that are behind a feature flag and have the ~"feature flag" label.
During the feature freeze all merge requests that are meant to go into the
upcoming release should have the correct milestone assigned _and_ the
`Pick into X.Y` label where `X.Y` is equal to the milestone, so that release
managers can find and pick them.
Merge requests without this label will not be picked into the stable release.
For example, if the upcoming release is `10.2.0` you will need to set the
`Pick into 10.2` label.
Fixes marked like this will be shipped in the next RC (before the 22nd), or the
next patch release.
If a merge request is to be picked into more than one release it will need one
`Pick into X.Y` label per release where the merge request should be back-ported
to. For example:
-`Pick into 10.1`
-`Pick into 10.0`
-`Pick into 9.5`
### Asking for an exception
If you think a merge request should go into an RC or patch even though it does not meet these requirements,
you can ask for an exception to be made.
Check [this guide](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/release/docs/blob/master/general/exception-request/process.md) about how to open an exception request before opening one.
## Bugs
A ~bug is a defect, error, failure which causes the system to behave incorrectly or prevents it from fulfilling the product requirements.
...
...
@@ -256,13 +118,6 @@ Regressions should be considered high priority issues that should be solved as s
### Managing bugs
**Prioritization:** We give higher priority to regressions on features that worked in the last recent monthly release and the current release candidates.
The two scenarios below can [bypass the exception request in the release process](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/release/docs/blob/master/general/exception-request/process.md#after-the-7th), where the affected regression version matches the current monthly release version.
* A regression which worked in the **Last monthly release**
***Example:** In 11.0 we released a new `feature X` that is verified as working. Then in release 11.1 the feature no longer works, this is regression for 11.1. The issue should have the `regression:11.1` label.
**Note:* When we say `the last recent monthly release`, this can refer to either the version currently running on GitLab.com, or the most recent version available in the package repositories.
* A regression which worked in the **Current release candidates**
***Example:** In 11.1-RC3 we shipped a new feature which has been verified as working. Then in 11.1-RC5 the feature no longer works, this is regression for 11.1. The issue should have the `regression:11.1` label.
**Note:* Because GitLab.com runs release candidates of new releases, a regression can be reported in a release before its 'official' release date on the 22nd of the month.
When a bug is found:
1. Create an issue describing the problem in the most detailed way possible.
_("for %{link_to_merge_request} with %{link_to_merge_request_source_branch} into %{link_to_merge_request_target_branch}").html_safe%{link_to_merge_request: link_to_merge_request,link_to_merge_request_source_branch: link_to_merge_request_source_branch,link_to_merge_request_target_branch: link_to_merge_request_target_branch}
_("for %{link_to_merge_request} with %{link_to_merge_request_source_branch} into %{link_to_merge_request_target_branch}")
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ The following table lists available parameters for jobs:
| [`environment`](#environment) | Name of an environment to which the job deploys. Also available: `environment:name`, `environment:url`, `environment:on_stop`, and `environment:action`. |
| [`cache`](#cache) | List of files that should be cached between subsequent runs. Also available: `cache:paths`, `cache:key`, `cache:untracked`, and `cache:policy`. |
| [`artifacts`](#artifacts) | List of files and directories to attach to a job on success. Also available: `artifacts:paths`, `artifacts:name`, `artifacts:untracked`, `artifacts:when`, `artifacts:expire_in`, `artifacts:reports`, and `artifacts:reports:junit`.<br><br>In GitLab [Enterprise Edition](https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/), these are available: `artifacts:reports:codequality`, `artifacts:reports:sast`, `artifacts:reports:dependency_scanning`, `artifacts:reports:container_scanning`, `artifacts:reports:dast`, `artifacts:reports:license_management`, `artifacts:reports:performance` and `artifacts:reports:metrics`. |
| [`dependencies`](#dependencies) | Other jobs that a job depends on so that you can pass artifacts between them. |
| [`dependencies`](#dependencies) | Restrict which artifacts are passed to a specific job by providing a list of jobs to fetch artifacts from. |
| [`coverage`](#coverage) | Code coverage settings for a given job. |
| [`retry`](#retry) | When and how many times a job can be auto-retried in case of a failure. |
| [`timeout`](#timeout) | Define a custom job-level timeout that takes precedence over the project-wide setting. |
...
...
@@ -782,6 +782,8 @@ In this example, a job either set to:
#### `rules:exists`
> [Introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/merge_requests/16574) in GitLab 12.4.
`exists` accepts an array of paths and will match if any of these paths exist
as files in the repository.
...
...
@@ -1455,7 +1457,7 @@ be available for download in the GitLab UI.
You can only use paths that are within the local working copy.
Wildcards can be used that follow the [glob](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glob_(programming)) patterns and [filepath.Match](https://golang.org/pkg/path/filepath/#Match).
To pass artifacts between different jobs, see [dependencies](#dependencies).
To restrict which jobs a specific job will fetch artifacts from, see [dependencies](#dependencies).
Send all files in `binaries` and `.config`:
...
...
@@ -1799,10 +1801,9 @@ be automatically shown in merge requests.
> Introduced in GitLab 8.6 and GitLab Runner v1.1.1.
This feature should be used in conjunction with [`artifacts`](#artifacts) and
allows you to define the artifacts to pass between different jobs.
Note that `artifacts` from all previous [stages](#stages) are passed by default.
By default, all [`artifacts`](#artifacts) from all previous [stages](#stages)
are passed, but you can use the `dependencies` parameter to define a limited
list of jobs (or no jobs) to fetch artifacts from.
To use this feature, define `dependencies` in context of the job and pass
a list of all previous jobs from which the artifacts should be downloaded.
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ description: How to add docs for new or enhanced GitLab features.
At GitLab, developers contribute new or updated documentation along with their code, but product managers and technical writers also have essential roles in the process.
-**Developers**: Author/update documentation in the same MR as their code, and
merge it by the feature freeze for the assigned milestone. Request technical writer
merge it in the assigned milestone. Request technical writer
assistance if needed. Other developers typically act as reviewers.
-**Product Managers** (PMs): In the issue for all new and enhanced features,
confirm the documentation requirements, plus the mentioned feature description
...
...
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ interact with GitLab.
NOTE: **Note:**
When revamping documentation, if unrelated to the feature change, this should be submitted
in its own MR (using the [documentation improvement workflow](improvement-workflow.md))
so that we can ensure the more time-sensitive doc updates are merged with code by the freeze.
so that we can ensure the more time-sensitive doc updates are merged sooner.
