Commit 77a7772c authored by GitLab Bot's avatar GitLab Bot

Add latest changes from gitlab-org/gitlab@master

parent f7234a08
...@@ -11,15 +11,6 @@ ...@@ -11,15 +11,6 @@
- [Merge request coaching](#merge-request-coaching) - [Merge request coaching](#merge-request-coaching)
- [Assigning issues](#assigning-issues) - [Assigning issues](#assigning-issues)
- [Be kind](#be-kind) - [Be kind](#be-kind)
- [Feature freeze on the 7th for the release on the 22nd](#feature-freeze-on-the-7th-for-the-release-on-the-22nd)
- [Feature flags](#feature-flags)
- [Between the 1st and the 7th](#between-the-1st-and-the-7th)
- [What happens if these deadlines are missed?](#what-happens-if-these-deadlines-are-missed)
- [On the 7th](#on-the-7th)
- [Feature merge requests](#feature-merge-requests)
- [Documentation merge requests](#documentation-merge-requests)
- [After the 7th](#after-the-7th)
- [Asking for an exception](#asking-for-an-exception)
- [Bugs](#bugs) - [Bugs](#bugs)
- [Regressions](#regressions) - [Regressions](#regressions)
- [Managing bugs](#managing-bugs) - [Managing bugs](#managing-bugs)
...@@ -100,135 +91,6 @@ Product Managers must have their proposal for that milestone ready by the 22nd o ...@@ -100,135 +91,6 @@ Product Managers must have their proposal for that milestone ready by the 22nd o
This proposal will be shared with Engineering for discussion, feedback, and planning. This proposal will be shared with Engineering for discussion, feedback, and planning.
The plan for the upcoming milestone must be finalized by the 1st of the month, one week before kickoff on the 8th. The plan for the upcoming milestone must be finalized by the 1st of the month, one week before kickoff on the 8th.
## Feature freeze on the 7th for the release on the 22nd
The feature freeze on the 7th has been discontinued. [Transition period overview](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/release/docs/blob/21cbd409dd5f157fe252f254f3e897f01908abe2/general/deploy/auto-deploy-transition.md#transition)
describes the change to this process. During the transition period, the only guarantee that
a change will be included in the release on the 22nd is if the change has been
deployed to GitLab.com prior to this date.
### Between the 1st and the 7th
These types of merge requests for the upcoming release need special consideration:
* **Large features**: a large feature is one that is highlighted in the kick-off
and the release blogpost; typically this will have its own channel in Slack
and a dedicated team with front-end, back-end, and UX.
* **Small features**: any other feature request.
It is strongly recommended that **large features** be with a maintainer **by the
1st**. This means that:
* There is a merge request (even if it's WIP).
* The person (or people, if it needs a frontend and backend maintainer) who will
ultimately be responsible for merging this have been pinged on the MR.
It's OK if merge request isn't completely done, but this allows the maintainer
enough time to make the decision about whether this can make it in before the
freeze. If the maintainer doesn't think it will make it, they should inform the
developers working on it and the Product Manager responsible for the feature.
The maintainer can also choose to assign a reviewer to perform an initial
review, but this way the maintainer is unlikely to be surprised by receiving an
MR later in the cycle.
It is strongly recommended that **small features** be with a reviewer (not
necessarily a maintainer) **by the 3rd**.
Most merge requests from the community do not have a specific release
target. However, if one does and falls into either of the above categories, it's
the reviewer's responsibility to manage the above communication and assignment
on behalf of the community member.
Every new feature or change should be shipped with its corresponding documentation
in accordance with the
[documentation process](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/documentation/feature-change-workflow.html)
and [structure](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/documentation/structure.html) guides.
Note that a technical writer will review all changes to documentation. This can occur
in the same MR as the feature code, but [if there is not sufficient time or need,
it can be planned via a follow-up issue for doc review](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/documentation/feature-change-workflow.html#1-product-managers-role),
and another MR, if needed. Regardless, complete docs must be merged with code by the freeze.
#### What happens if these deadlines are missed?
If a small or large feature is _not_ with a maintainer or reviewer by the
recommended date, this does _not_ mean that maintainers or reviewers will refuse
to review or merge it, or that the feature will definitely not make it in before
the feature freeze.
However, with every day that passes without review, it will become more likely
that the feature will slip, because maintainers and reviewers may not have
enough time to do a thorough review, and developers may not have enough time to
adequately address any feedback that may come back.
A maintainer or reviewer may also determine that it will not be possible to
finish the current scope of the feature in time, but that it is possible to
reduce the scope so that something can still ship this month, with the remaining
scope moving to the next release. The sooner this decision is made, in
conversation with the Product Manager and developer, the more time there is to
extract that which is now out of scope, and to finish that which remains in scope.
For these reasons, it is strongly recommended to follow the guidelines above,
to maximize the chances of your feature making it in before the feature freeze,
and to prevent any last minute surprises.
### On the 7th
Merge requests should still be complete, following the [definition of done][done].
If a merge request is not ready, but the developers and Product Manager
responsible for the feature think it is essential that it is in the release,
they can [ask for an exception](#asking-for-an-exception) in advance. This is
preferable to merging something that we are not confident in, but should still
be a rare case: most features can be allowed to slip a release.
All Community Edition merge requests from GitLab team members merged on the
freeze date (the 7th) should have a corresponding Enterprise Edition merge
request, even if there are no conflicts. This is to reduce the size of the
subsequent EE merge, as we often merge a lot to CE on the release date. For more
information, see
[Automatic CE->EE merge][automatic_ce_ee_merge] and
[Guidelines for implementing Enterprise Edition features][ee_features].
### After the 7th
Once the stable branch is frozen, the only MRs that can be cherry-picked into
the stable branch are:
* Fixes for [regressions](#regressions) where the affected version `xx.x` in `regression:xx.x` is the current release. See [Managing bugs](#managing-bugs) section.
* Fixes for security issues.
* Fixes or improvements to automated QA scenarios.
* [Documentation improvements](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/documentation/workflow.html) for feature changes made in the same release, though initial docs for these features should have already been merged by the freeze, as required.
* New or updated translations (as long as they do not touch application code).
* Changes that are behind a feature flag and have the ~"feature flag" label.
During the feature freeze all merge requests that are meant to go into the
upcoming release should have the correct milestone assigned _and_ the
`Pick into X.Y` label where `X.Y` is equal to the milestone, so that release
managers can find and pick them.
Merge requests without this label will not be picked into the stable release.
For example, if the upcoming release is `10.2.0` you will need to set the
`Pick into 10.2` label.
Fixes marked like this will be shipped in the next RC (before the 22nd), or the
next patch release.
If a merge request is to be picked into more than one release it will need one
`Pick into X.Y` label per release where the merge request should be back-ported
to. For example:
- `Pick into 10.1`
- `Pick into 10.0`
- `Pick into 9.5`
### Asking for an exception
If you think a merge request should go into an RC or patch even though it does not meet these requirements,
you can ask for an exception to be made.
Check [this guide](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/release/docs/blob/master/general/exception-request/process.md) about how to open an exception request before opening one.
## Bugs ## Bugs
A ~bug is a defect, error, failure which causes the system to behave incorrectly or prevents it from fulfilling the product requirements. A ~bug is a defect, error, failure which causes the system to behave incorrectly or prevents it from fulfilling the product requirements.
...@@ -256,13 +118,6 @@ Regressions should be considered high priority issues that should be solved as s ...@@ -256,13 +118,6 @@ Regressions should be considered high priority issues that should be solved as s
### Managing bugs ### Managing bugs
**Prioritization:** We give higher priority to regressions on features that worked in the last recent monthly release and the current release candidates. **Prioritization:** We give higher priority to regressions on features that worked in the last recent monthly release and the current release candidates.
The two scenarios below can [bypass the exception request in the release process](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/release/docs/blob/master/general/exception-request/process.md#after-the-7th), where the affected regression version matches the current monthly release version.
* A regression which worked in the **Last monthly release**
* **Example:** In 11.0 we released a new `feature X` that is verified as working. Then in release 11.1 the feature no longer works, this is regression for 11.1. The issue should have the `regression:11.1` label.
* *Note:* When we say `the last recent monthly release`, this can refer to either the version currently running on GitLab.com, or the most recent version available in the package repositories.
* A regression which worked in the **Current release candidates**
* **Example:** In 11.1-RC3 we shipped a new feature which has been verified as working. Then in 11.1-RC5 the feature no longer works, this is regression for 11.1. The issue should have the `regression:11.1` label.
* *Note:* Because GitLab.com runs release candidates of new releases, a regression can be reported in a release before its 'official' release date on the 22nd of the month.
When a bug is found: When a bug is found:
1. Create an issue describing the problem in the most detailed way possible. 1. Create an issue describing the problem in the most detailed way possible.
......
...@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ export default { ...@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ export default {
v-gl-modal="modalId" v-gl-modal="modalId"
:title="s__('ContainerRegistry|Remove repository')" :title="s__('ContainerRegistry|Remove repository')"
:aria-label="s__('ContainerRegistry|Remove repository')" :aria-label="s__('ContainerRegistry|Remove repository')"
data-track-event="click_button"
data-track-label="registry_repository_delete"
class="js-remove-repo btn-inverted" class="js-remove-repo btn-inverted"
variant="danger" variant="danger"
> >
......
...@@ -192,6 +192,8 @@ export default { ...@@ -192,6 +192,8 @@ export default {
v-gl-modal="modalId" v-gl-modal="modalId"
:disabled="!itemsToBeDeleted || itemsToBeDeleted.length === 0" :disabled="!itemsToBeDeleted || itemsToBeDeleted.length === 0"
class="js-delete-registry float-right" class="js-delete-registry float-right"
data-track-event="click_button"
data-track-label="bulk_registry_tag_delete"
variant="danger" variant="danger"
:title="s__('ContainerRegistry|Remove selected tags')" :title="s__('ContainerRegistry|Remove selected tags')"
:aria-label="s__('ContainerRegistry|Remove selected tags')" :aria-label="s__('ContainerRegistry|Remove selected tags')"
...@@ -246,6 +248,8 @@ export default { ...@@ -246,6 +248,8 @@ export default {
v-gl-modal="modalId" v-gl-modal="modalId"
:title="s__('ContainerRegistry|Remove tag')" :title="s__('ContainerRegistry|Remove tag')"
:aria-label="s__('ContainerRegistry|Remove tag')" :aria-label="s__('ContainerRegistry|Remove tag')"
data-track-event="click_button"
data-track-label="registry_tag_delete"
variant="danger" variant="danger"
class="js-delete-registry-row float-right btn-inverted btn-border-color btn-icon" class="js-delete-registry-row float-right btn-inverted btn-border-color btn-icon"
@click="deleteSingleItem(index)" @click="deleteSingleItem(index)"
......
# frozen_string_literal: true # frozen_string_literal: true
class Projects::PipelinesController < Projects::ApplicationController class Projects::PipelinesController < Projects::ApplicationController
include ::Gitlab::Utils::StrongMemoize
before_action :whitelist_query_limiting, only: [:create, :retry] before_action :whitelist_query_limiting, only: [:create, :retry]
before_action :pipeline, except: [:index, :new, :create, :charts] before_action :pipeline, except: [:index, :new, :create, :charts]
before_action :set_pipeline_path, only: [:show] before_action :set_pipeline_path, only: [:show]
...@@ -151,6 +153,19 @@ class Projects::PipelinesController < Projects::ApplicationController ...@@ -151,6 +153,19 @@ class Projects::PipelinesController < Projects::ApplicationController
@counts[:failed] = @project.all_pipelines.failed.count(:all) @counts[:failed] = @project.all_pipelines.failed.count(:all)
end end
def test_report
return unless Feature.enabled?(:junit_pipeline_view, project)
if pipeline_test_report == :error
render json: { status: :error_parsing_report }
return
end
render json: TestReportSerializer
.new(current_user: @current_user)
.represent(pipeline_test_report)
end
private private
def serialize_pipelines def serialize_pipelines
...@@ -217,6 +232,14 @@ class Projects::PipelinesController < Projects::ApplicationController ...@@ -217,6 +232,14 @@ class Projects::PipelinesController < Projects::ApplicationController
view_context.limited_counter_with_delimiter(finder.execute) view_context.limited_counter_with_delimiter(finder.execute)
end end
def pipeline_test_report
strong_memoize(:pipeline_test_report) do
@pipeline.test_reports
rescue Gitlab::Ci::Parsers::ParserError
:error
end
end
end end
Projects::PipelinesController.prepend_if_ee('EE::Projects::PipelinesController') Projects::PipelinesController.prepend_if_ee('EE::Projects::PipelinesController')
...@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ module Projects ...@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ module Projects
def index def index
@images = project.container_repositories @images = project.container_repositories
track_event(:list_repositories)
respond_to do |format| respond_to do |format|
format.html format.html
...@@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ module Projects ...@@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ module Projects
def destroy def destroy
DeleteContainerRepositoryWorker.perform_async(current_user.id, image.id) DeleteContainerRepositoryWorker.perform_async(current_user.id, image.id)
track_event(:delete_repository)
respond_to do |format| respond_to do |format|
format.json { head :no_content } format.json { head :no_content }
......
...@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ module Projects ...@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ module Projects
LIMIT = 15 LIMIT = 15
def index def index
track_event(:list_tags)
respond_to do |format| respond_to do |format|
format.json do format.json do
render json: ContainerTagsSerializer render json: ContainerTagsSerializer
...@@ -22,6 +23,7 @@ module Projects ...@@ -22,6 +23,7 @@ module Projects
result = Projects::ContainerRepository::DeleteTagsService result = Projects::ContainerRepository::DeleteTagsService
.new(image.project, current_user, tags: [params[:id]]) .new(image.project, current_user, tags: [params[:id]])
.execute(image) .execute(image)
track_event(:delete_tag)
respond_to do |format| respond_to do |format|
format.json { head(result[:status] == :success ? :ok : bad_request) } format.json { head(result[:status] == :success ? :ok : bad_request) }
...@@ -43,6 +45,7 @@ module Projects ...@@ -43,6 +45,7 @@ module Projects
result = Projects::ContainerRepository::DeleteTagsService result = Projects::ContainerRepository::DeleteTagsService
.new(image.project, current_user, tags: tag_names) .new(image.project, current_user, tags: tag_names)
.execute(image) .execute(image)
track_event(:delete_tag_bulk)
respond_to do |format| respond_to do |format|
format.json { head(result[:status] == :success ? :no_content : :bad_request) } format.json { head(result[:status] == :success ? :no_content : :bad_request) }
......
...@@ -746,6 +746,10 @@ module Ci ...@@ -746,6 +746,10 @@ module Ci
end end
end end
def all_merge_requests_by_recency
all_merge_requests.order(id: :desc)
end
def detailed_status(current_user) def detailed_status(current_user)
Gitlab::Ci::Status::Pipeline::Factory Gitlab::Ci::Status::Pipeline::Factory
.new(self, current_user) .new(self, current_user)
......
...@@ -112,7 +112,12 @@ module Clusters ...@@ -112,7 +112,12 @@ module Clusters
def delete_knative_istio_metrics def delete_knative_istio_metrics
return [] unless cluster.application_knative_available? return [] unless cluster.application_knative_available?
[Gitlab::Kubernetes::KubectlCmd.delete("-f", Clusters::Applications::Knative::METRICS_CONFIG)] [
Gitlab::Kubernetes::KubectlCmd.delete(
"-f", Clusters::Applications::Knative::METRICS_CONFIG,
"--ignore-not-found"
)
]
end end
end end
end end
......
...@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ module RelativePositioning ...@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ module RelativePositioning
if pos_after && (pos_after - pos_before) < 2 if pos_after && (pos_after - pos_before) < 2
before.move_sequence_after before.move_sequence_after
pos_after = before.next_relative_position
end end
self.relative_position = self.class.position_between(pos_before, pos_after) self.relative_position = self.class.position_between(pos_before, pos_after)
...@@ -138,6 +139,7 @@ module RelativePositioning ...@@ -138,6 +139,7 @@ module RelativePositioning
if pos_before && (pos_after - pos_before) < 2 if pos_before && (pos_after - pos_before) < 2
after.move_sequence_before after.move_sequence_before
pos_before = after.prev_relative_position
end end
self.relative_position = self.class.position_between(pos_before, pos_after) self.relative_position = self.class.position_between(pos_before, pos_after)
......
...@@ -48,15 +48,35 @@ module Ci ...@@ -48,15 +48,35 @@ module Ci
def ref_text def ref_text
if pipeline.detached_merge_request_pipeline? if pipeline.detached_merge_request_pipeline?
_("for %{link_to_merge_request} with %{link_to_merge_request_source_branch}").html_safe % { link_to_merge_request: link_to_merge_request, link_to_merge_request_source_branch: link_to_merge_request_source_branch } _("for %{link_to_merge_request} with %{link_to_merge_request_source_branch}")
.html_safe % {
link_to_merge_request: link_to_merge_request,
link_to_merge_request_source_branch: link_to_merge_request_source_branch
}
elsif pipeline.merge_request_pipeline? elsif pipeline.merge_request_pipeline?
_("for %{link_to_merge_request} with %{link_to_merge_request_source_branch} into %{link_to_merge_request_target_branch}").html_safe % { link_to_merge_request: link_to_merge_request, link_to_merge_request_source_branch: link_to_merge_request_source_branch, link_to_merge_request_target_branch: link_to_merge_request_target_branch } _("for %{link_to_merge_request} with %{link_to_merge_request_source_branch} into %{link_to_merge_request_target_branch}")
.html_safe % {
link_to_merge_request: link_to_merge_request,
link_to_merge_request_source_branch: link_to_merge_request_source_branch,
link_to_merge_request_target_branch: link_to_merge_request_target_branch
}
elsif pipeline.ref && pipeline.ref_exists?
_("for %{link_to_pipeline_ref}")
.html_safe % { link_to_pipeline_ref: link_to_pipeline_ref }
elsif pipeline.ref elsif pipeline.ref
if pipeline.ref_exists? _("for %{ref}").html_safe % { ref: plain_ref_name }
_("for %{link_to_pipeline_ref}").html_safe % { link_to_pipeline_ref: link_to_pipeline_ref } end
else end
_("for %{ref}").html_safe % { ref: content_tag(:span, pipeline.ref, class: 'ref-name') }
end def all_related_merge_request_text
if all_related_merge_requests.none?
'No related merge requests found.'
else
_("%{count} related %{pluralized_subject}: %{links}" % {
count: all_related_merge_requests.count,
pluralized_subject: 'merge request'.pluralize(all_related_merge_requests.count),
links: all_related_merge_request_links.join(', ')
}).html_safe
end end
end end
...@@ -84,10 +104,30 @@ module Ci ...@@ -84,10 +104,30 @@ module Ci
private private
def plain_ref_name
content_tag(:span, pipeline.ref, class: 'ref-name')
end
def merge_request_presenter def merge_request_presenter
return unless pipeline.triggered_by_merge_request? strong_memoize(:merge_request_presenter) do
if pipeline.triggered_by_merge_request?
pipeline.merge_request.present(current_user: current_user)
end
end
end
@merge_request_presenter ||= pipeline.merge_request.present(current_user: current_user) def all_related_merge_request_links
all_related_merge_requests.map do |merge_request|
mr_path = project_merge_request_path(merge_request.project, merge_request)
link_to "#{merge_request.to_reference} #{merge_request.title}", mr_path, class: 'mr-iid'
end
end
def all_related_merge_requests
strong_memoize(:all_related_merge_requests) do
pipeline.ref ? pipeline.all_merge_requests_by_recency.to_a : []
end
end end
end end
end end
......
# frozen_string_literal: true
class TestReportEntity < Grape::Entity
expose :total_time
expose :total_count
expose :success_count
expose :failed_count
expose :skipped_count
expose :error_count
expose :test_suites, using: TestSuiteEntity do |report|
report.test_suites.values
end
end
# frozen_string_literal: true
class TestReportSerializer < BaseSerializer
entity TestReportEntity
end
# frozen_string_literal: true
class TestSuiteEntity < Grape::Entity
expose :name
expose :total_time
expose :total_count
expose :success_count
expose :failed_count
expose :skipped_count
expose :error_count
expose :test_cases, using: TestCaseEntity do |test_suite|
test_suite.test_cases.values.flat_map(&:values)
end
end
---
title: Collect docker registry related metrics
merge_request: 17063
author:
type: added
---
title: Fix relative positioning when moving items down and there is no space
merge_request: 17781
author:
type: fixed
---
title: Avoid knative and prometheus uninstall race condition
merge_request: 18020
author:
type: changed
---
title: Use MR links in PipelinePresenter#ref_text for branch pipelines
merge_request: 17947
author:
type: changed
...@@ -319,8 +319,7 @@ production: &base ...@@ -319,8 +319,7 @@ production: &base
artifacts_server: true # Set to false if you want to disable online view of HTML artifacts artifacts_server: true # Set to false if you want to disable online view of HTML artifacts
# external_http: ["1.1.1.1:80", "[2001::1]:80"] # If defined, enables custom domain support in GitLab Pages # external_http: ["1.1.1.1:80", "[2001::1]:80"] # If defined, enables custom domain support in GitLab Pages
# external_https: ["1.1.1.1:443", "[2001::1]:443"] # If defined, enables custom domain and certificate support in GitLab Pages # external_https: ["1.1.1.1:443", "[2001::1]:443"] # If defined, enables custom domain and certificate support in GitLab Pages
admin:
address: unix:/home/git/gitlab/tmp/sockets/private/pages-admin.socket # TCP connections are supported too (e.g. tcp://host:port)
# File that contains the shared secret key for verifying access for gitlab-pages. # File that contains the shared secret key for verifying access for gitlab-pages.
# Default is '.gitlab_pages_shared_secret' relative to Rails.root (i.e. root of the GitLab app). # Default is '.gitlab_pages_shared_secret' relative to Rails.root (i.e. root of the GitLab app).
# secret_file: /home/git/gitlab/.gitlab_pages_shared_secret # secret_file: /home/git/gitlab/.gitlab_pages_shared_secret
......
...@@ -290,9 +290,6 @@ Settings.pages['url'] ||= Settings.__send__(:build_pages_url) ...@@ -290,9 +290,6 @@ Settings.pages['url'] ||= Settings.__send__(:build_pages_url)
Settings.pages['external_http'] ||= false unless Settings.pages['external_http'].present? Settings.pages['external_http'] ||= false unless Settings.pages['external_http'].present?
Settings.pages['external_https'] ||= false unless Settings.pages['external_https'].present? Settings.pages['external_https'] ||= false unless Settings.pages['external_https'].present?
Settings.pages['artifacts_server'] ||= Settings.pages['enabled'] if Settings.pages['artifacts_server'].nil? Settings.pages['artifacts_server'] ||= Settings.pages['enabled'] if Settings.pages['artifacts_server'].nil?
Settings.pages['admin'] ||= Settingslogic.new({})
Settings.pages.admin['certificate'] ||= ''
Settings.pages['secret_file'] ||= Rails.root.join('.gitlab_pages_shared_secret') Settings.pages['secret_file'] ||= Rails.root.join('.gitlab_pages_shared_secret')
# #
......
Gitlab::PagesClient.read_or_create_token
Gitlab::PagesClient.load_certificate
...@@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ constraints(::Constraints::ProjectUrlConstrainer.new) do ...@@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ constraints(::Constraints::ProjectUrlConstrainer.new) do
get :builds get :builds
get :failures get :failures
get :status get :status
get :test_report
Gitlab.ee do Gitlab.ee do
get :security get :security
......
...@@ -294,9 +294,11 @@ This log records: ...@@ -294,9 +294,11 @@ This log records:
- Information whenever [Rack Attack] registers an abusive request. - Information whenever [Rack Attack] registers an abusive request.
- Requests over the [Rate Limit] on raw endpoints. - Requests over the [Rate Limit] on raw endpoints.
- [Protected paths] abusive requests.
NOTE: **Note:** NOTE: **Note:**
From [%12.1](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/62756), user id and username are available on this log. From [%12.1](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/62756), user id and username are also
recorded on this log, if available.
## `graphql_json.log` ## `graphql_json.log`
...@@ -341,10 +343,6 @@ will be generated in `/var/log/gitlab/gitlab-rails/web_exporter.log` for ...@@ -341,10 +343,6 @@ will be generated in `/var/log/gitlab/gitlab-rails/web_exporter.log` for
Omnibus GitLab packages or in `/home/git/gitlab/log/web_exporter.log` for Omnibus GitLab packages or in `/home/git/gitlab/log/web_exporter.log` for
installations from source. installations from source.
[repocheck]: repository_checks.md
[Rack Attack]: ../security/rack_attack.md
[Rate Limit]: ../user/admin_area/settings/rate_limits_on_raw_endpoints.md
## `database_load_balancing.log` **(PREMIUM ONLY)** ## `database_load_balancing.log` **(PREMIUM ONLY)**
> [Introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/merge_requests/15442) in GitLab 12.3. > [Introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/merge_requests/15442) in GitLab 12.3.
...@@ -354,3 +352,8 @@ It is stored at: ...@@ -354,3 +352,8 @@ It is stored at:
- `/var/log/gitlab/gitlab-rails/database_load_balancing.log` for Omnibus GitLab packages. - `/var/log/gitlab/gitlab-rails/database_load_balancing.log` for Omnibus GitLab packages.
- `/home/git/gitlab/log/database_load_balancing.log` for installations from source. - `/home/git/gitlab/log/database_load_balancing.log` for installations from source.
[repocheck]: repository_checks.md
[Rack Attack]: ../security/rack_attack.md
[Rate Limit]: ../user/admin_area/settings/rate_limits_on_raw_endpoints.md
[Protected paths]: ../user/admin_area/settings/protected_paths.md
...@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ The following table lists available parameters for jobs: ...@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ The following table lists available parameters for jobs:
| [`environment`](#environment) | Name of an environment to which the job deploys. Also available: `environment:name`, `environment:url`, `environment:on_stop`, and `environment:action`. | | [`environment`](#environment) | Name of an environment to which the job deploys. Also available: `environment:name`, `environment:url`, `environment:on_stop`, and `environment:action`. |
| [`cache`](#cache) | List of files that should be cached between subsequent runs. Also available: `cache:paths`, `cache:key`, `cache:untracked`, and `cache:policy`. | | [`cache`](#cache) | List of files that should be cached between subsequent runs. Also available: `cache:paths`, `cache:key`, `cache:untracked`, and `cache:policy`. |
| [`artifacts`](#artifacts) | List of files and directories to attach to a job on success. Also available: `artifacts:paths`, `artifacts:name`, `artifacts:untracked`, `artifacts:when`, `artifacts:expire_in`, `artifacts:reports`, and `artifacts:reports:junit`.<br><br>In GitLab [Enterprise Edition](https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/), these are available: `artifacts:reports:codequality`, `artifacts:reports:sast`, `artifacts:reports:dependency_scanning`, `artifacts:reports:container_scanning`, `artifacts:reports:dast`, `artifacts:reports:license_management`, `artifacts:reports:performance` and `artifacts:reports:metrics`. | | [`artifacts`](#artifacts) | List of files and directories to attach to a job on success. Also available: `artifacts:paths`, `artifacts:name`, `artifacts:untracked`, `artifacts:when`, `artifacts:expire_in`, `artifacts:reports`, and `artifacts:reports:junit`.<br><br>In GitLab [Enterprise Edition](https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/), these are available: `artifacts:reports:codequality`, `artifacts:reports:sast`, `artifacts:reports:dependency_scanning`, `artifacts:reports:container_scanning`, `artifacts:reports:dast`, `artifacts:reports:license_management`, `artifacts:reports:performance` and `artifacts:reports:metrics`. |
| [`dependencies`](#dependencies) | Other jobs that a job depends on so that you can pass artifacts between them. | | [`dependencies`](#dependencies) | Restrict which artifacts are passed to a specific job by providing a list of jobs to fetch artifacts from. |
| [`coverage`](#coverage) | Code coverage settings for a given job. | | [`coverage`](#coverage) | Code coverage settings for a given job. |
| [`retry`](#retry) | When and how many times a job can be auto-retried in case of a failure. | | [`retry`](#retry) | When and how many times a job can be auto-retried in case of a failure. |
| [`timeout`](#timeout) | Define a custom job-level timeout that takes precedence over the project-wide setting. | | [`timeout`](#timeout) | Define a custom job-level timeout that takes precedence over the project-wide setting. |
...@@ -782,6 +782,8 @@ In this example, a job either set to: ...@@ -782,6 +782,8 @@ In this example, a job either set to:
#### `rules:exists` #### `rules:exists`
> [Introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/merge_requests/16574) in GitLab 12.4.
`exists` accepts an array of paths and will match if any of these paths exist `exists` accepts an array of paths and will match if any of these paths exist
as files in the repository. as files in the repository.
...@@ -1455,7 +1457,7 @@ be available for download in the GitLab UI. ...@@ -1455,7 +1457,7 @@ be available for download in the GitLab UI.
You can only use paths that are within the local working copy. You can only use paths that are within the local working copy.
Wildcards can be used that follow the [glob](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glob_(programming)) patterns and [filepath.Match](https://golang.org/pkg/path/filepath/#Match). Wildcards can be used that follow the [glob](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glob_(programming)) patterns and [filepath.Match](https://golang.org/pkg/path/filepath/#Match).
To pass artifacts between different jobs, see [dependencies](#dependencies). To restrict which jobs a specific job will fetch artifacts from, see [dependencies](#dependencies).
Send all files in `binaries` and `.config`: Send all files in `binaries` and `.config`:
...@@ -1799,10 +1801,9 @@ be automatically shown in merge requests. ...@@ -1799,10 +1801,9 @@ be automatically shown in merge requests.
> Introduced in GitLab 8.6 and GitLab Runner v1.1.1. > Introduced in GitLab 8.6 and GitLab Runner v1.1.1.
This feature should be used in conjunction with [`artifacts`](#artifacts) and By default, all [`artifacts`](#artifacts) from all previous [stages](#stages)
allows you to define the artifacts to pass between different jobs. are passed, but you can use the `dependencies` parameter to define a limited
list of jobs (or no jobs) to fetch artifacts from.
Note that `artifacts` from all previous [stages](#stages) are passed by default.
To use this feature, define `dependencies` in context of the job and pass To use this feature, define `dependencies` in context of the job and pass
a list of all previous jobs from which the artifacts should be downloaded. a list of all previous jobs from which the artifacts should be downloaded.
......
...@@ -256,18 +256,12 @@ Since [unblocking others is always a top priority](https://about.gitlab.com/hand ...@@ -256,18 +256,12 @@ Since [unblocking others is always a top priority](https://about.gitlab.com/hand
reviewers are expected to review assigned merge requests in a timely manner, reviewers are expected to review assigned merge requests in a timely manner,
even when this may negatively impact their other tasks and priorities. even when this may negatively impact their other tasks and priorities.
Doing so allows everyone involved in the merge request to iterate faster as the Doing so allows everyone involved in the merge request to iterate faster as the
context is fresh in memory, improves contributors' experiences significantly, context is fresh in memory, improves contributors' experiences significantly.
and gives authors more time to address feedback and iterate on their work before
the [feature freeze](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/blob/master/PROCESS.md#feature-freeze-on-the-7th-for-the-release-on-the-22nd).
A turnaround time of two working days is usually acceptable, since engineers A turnaround time of two working days is usually acceptable, since engineers
will typically have other things to work on while they're waiting for review, will typically have other things to work on while they're waiting for review,
but don't hesitate to ask the author if it's unclear what time frame would be but don't hesitate to ask the author if it's unclear what time frame would be
acceptable, how urgent the review is, or how significant the blockage. Authors acceptable, how urgent the review is, or how significant the blockage.
are also encouraged to provide this information up-front to reviewers, but are
expected to be mindful of the [guidelines on when to ask for review on MRs that
are intended to go in before the feature freeze](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/blob/master/PROCESS.md#between-the-1st-and-the-7th),
and realistic in their expectations if these were not followed.
If you don't think you'll be able to review a merge request within a reasonable If you don't think you'll be able to review a merge request within a reasonable
time frame, let the author know as soon as possible and try to help them find time frame, let the author know as soon as possible and try to help them find
......
...@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ description: How to add docs for new or enhanced GitLab features. ...@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ description: How to add docs for new or enhanced GitLab features.
At GitLab, developers contribute new or updated documentation along with their code, but product managers and technical writers also have essential roles in the process. At GitLab, developers contribute new or updated documentation along with their code, but product managers and technical writers also have essential roles in the process.
- **Developers**: Author/update documentation in the same MR as their code, and - **Developers**: Author/update documentation in the same MR as their code, and
merge it by the feature freeze for the assigned milestone. Request technical writer merge it in the assigned milestone. Request technical writer
assistance if needed. Other developers typically act as reviewers. assistance if needed. Other developers typically act as reviewers.
- **Product Managers** (PMs): In the issue for all new and enhanced features, - **Product Managers** (PMs): In the issue for all new and enhanced features,
confirm the documentation requirements, plus the mentioned feature description confirm the documentation requirements, plus the mentioned feature description
...@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ interact with GitLab. ...@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ interact with GitLab.
NOTE: **Note:** NOTE: **Note:**
When revamping documentation, if unrelated to the feature change, this should be submitted When revamping documentation, if unrelated to the feature change, this should be submitted
in its own MR (using the [documentation improvement workflow](improvement-workflow.md)) in its own MR (using the [documentation improvement workflow](improvement-workflow.md))
so that we can ensure the more time-sensitive doc updates are merged with code by the freeze. so that we can ensure the more time-sensitive doc updates are merged sooner.
## Documentation requirements in feature issues ## Documentation requirements in feature issues
......
# frozen_string_literal: true
module Gitlab
class PagesClient
class << self
attr_reader :certificate, :token
def call(service, rpc, request, timeout: nil)
kwargs = request_kwargs(timeout)
stub(service).__send__(rpc, request, kwargs) # rubocop:disable GitlabSecurity/PublicSend
end
# This function is not thread-safe. Call it from an initializer only.
def read_or_create_token
@token = read_token
rescue Errno::ENOENT
# TODO: uncomment this when omnibus knows how to write the token file for us
# https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab/merge_requests/2466
#
# write_token(SecureRandom.random_bytes(64))
#
# # Read from disk in case someone else won the race and wrote the file
# # before us. If this fails again let the exception bubble up.
# @token = read_token
end
# This function is not thread-safe. Call it from an initializer only.
def load_certificate
cert_path = config.certificate
return unless cert_path.present?
@certificate = File.read(cert_path)
end
def ping
request = Grpc::Health::V1::HealthCheckRequest.new
call(:health_check, :check, request, timeout: 5.seconds)
end
private
def request_kwargs(timeout)
encoded_token = Base64.strict_encode64(token.to_s)
metadata = {
'authorization' => "Bearer #{encoded_token}"
}
result = { metadata: metadata }
return result unless timeout
# Do not use `Time.now` for deadline calculation, since it
# will be affected by Timecop in some tests, but grpc's c-core
# uses system time instead of timecop's time, so tests will fail
# `Time.at(Process.clock_gettime(Process::CLOCK_REALTIME))` will
# circumvent timecop
deadline = Time.at(Process.clock_gettime(Process::CLOCK_REALTIME)) + timeout
result[:deadline] = deadline
result
end
def stub(name)
stub_class(name).new(address, grpc_creds)
end
def stub_class(name)
if name == :health_check
Grpc::Health::V1::Health::Stub
else
# TODO use pages namespace
Gitaly.const_get(name.to_s.camelcase.to_sym).const_get(:Stub)
end
end
def address
addr = config.address
addr = addr.sub(%r{^tcp://}, '') if URI(addr).scheme == 'tcp'
addr
end
def grpc_creds
if address.start_with?('unix:')
:this_channel_is_insecure
elsif @certificate
GRPC::Core::ChannelCredentials.new(@certificate)
else
# Use system certificate pool
GRPC::Core::ChannelCredentials.new
end
end
def config
Gitlab.config.pages.admin
end
def read_token
File.read(token_path)
end
def token_path
Rails.root.join('.gitlab_pages_secret').to_s
end
def write_token(new_token)
Tempfile.open(File.basename(token_path), File.dirname(token_path), encoding: 'ascii-8bit') do |f|
f.write(new_token)
f.close
File.link(f.path, token_path)
end
rescue Errno::EACCES => ex
# TODO stop rescuing this exception in GitLab 11.0 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/45672
Rails.logger.error("Could not write pages admin token file: #{ex}") # rubocop:disable Gitlab/RailsLogger
rescue Errno::EEXIST
# Another process wrote the token file concurrently with us. Use their token, not ours.
end
end
end
end
namespace :gitlab do
namespace :pages do
desc 'Ping the pages admin API'
task admin_ping: :gitlab_environment do
Gitlab::PagesClient.ping
puts "OK: gitlab-pages admin API is reachable"
end
end
end
...@@ -223,6 +223,9 @@ msgid_plural "%{count} pending comments" ...@@ -223,6 +223,9 @@ msgid_plural "%{count} pending comments"
msgstr[0] "" msgstr[0] ""
msgstr[1] "" msgstr[1] ""
msgid "%{count} related %{pluralized_subject}: %{links}"
msgstr ""
msgid "%{duration}ms" msgid "%{duration}ms"
msgstr "" msgstr ""
......
...@@ -398,6 +398,76 @@ describe Projects::PipelinesController do ...@@ -398,6 +398,76 @@ describe Projects::PipelinesController do
end end
end end
describe 'GET test_report.json' do
subject(:get_test_report_json) do
post :test_report, params: {
namespace_id: project.namespace,
project_id: project,
id: pipeline.id
},
format: :json
end
context 'when feature is enabled' do
before do
stub_feature_flags(junit_pipeline_view: true)
end
context 'when pipeline does not have a test report' do
let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, project: project) }
it 'renders an empty test report' do
get_test_report_json
expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
expect(json_response['total_count']).to eq(0)
end
end
context 'when pipeline has a test report' do
let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, :with_test_reports, project: project) }
it 'renders the test report' do
get_test_report_json
expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
expect(json_response['total_count']).to eq(4)
end
end
context 'when pipeline has corrupt test reports' do
let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, project: project) }
before do
job = create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline)
create(:ci_job_artifact, :junit_with_corrupted_data, job: job, project: project)
end
it 'renders the test reports' do
get_test_report_json
expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
expect(json_response['status']).to eq('error_parsing_report')
end
end
end
context 'when feature is disabled' do
let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_empty_pipeline, project: project) }
before do
stub_feature_flags(junit_pipeline_view: false)
end
it 'renders empty response' do
get_test_report_json
expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:no_content)
expect(response.body).to be_empty
end
end
end
describe 'GET latest' do describe 'GET latest' do
let(:branch_main) { project.repository.branches[0] } let(:branch_main) { project.repository.branches[0] }
let(:branch_secondary) { project.repository.branches[1] } let(:branch_secondary) { project.repository.branches[1] }
......
...@@ -40,6 +40,12 @@ describe Projects::Registry::RepositoriesController do ...@@ -40,6 +40,12 @@ describe Projects::Registry::RepositoriesController do
expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok) expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
end end
it 'tracks the event' do
expect(Gitlab::Tracking).to receive(:event).with(anything, 'list_repositories', {})
go_to_index
end
it 'creates a root container repository' do it 'creates a root container repository' do
expect { go_to_index }.to change { ContainerRepository.all.count }.by(1) expect { go_to_index }.to change { ContainerRepository.all.count }.by(1)
expect(ContainerRepository.first).to be_root_repository expect(ContainerRepository.first).to be_root_repository
...@@ -92,8 +98,16 @@ describe Projects::Registry::RepositoriesController do ...@@ -92,8 +98,16 @@ describe Projects::Registry::RepositoriesController do
expect(DeleteContainerRepositoryWorker).to receive(:perform_async).with(user.id, repository.id) expect(DeleteContainerRepositoryWorker).to receive(:perform_async).with(user.id, repository.id)
delete_repository(repository) delete_repository(repository)
expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:no_content) expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:no_content)
end end
it 'tracks the event' do
expect(Gitlab::Tracking).to receive(:event).with(anything, 'delete_repository', {})
allow(DeleteContainerRepositoryWorker).to receive(:perform_async).with(user.id, repository.id)
delete_repository(repository)
end
end end
end end
end end
......
...@@ -38,6 +38,12 @@ describe Projects::Registry::TagsController do ...@@ -38,6 +38,12 @@ describe Projects::Registry::TagsController do
expect(response).to match_response_schema('registry/tags') expect(response).to match_response_schema('registry/tags')
expect(response).to include_pagination_headers expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
end end
it 'tracks the event' do
expect(Gitlab::Tracking).to receive(:event).with(anything, 'list_tags', {})
get_tags
end
end end
context 'when user can read the registry' do context 'when user can read the registry' do
...@@ -100,6 +106,13 @@ describe Projects::Registry::TagsController do ...@@ -100,6 +106,13 @@ describe Projects::Registry::TagsController do
destroy_tag('test.') destroy_tag('test.')
end end
it 'tracks the event' do
expect_delete_tags(%w[test.])
expect(controller).to receive(:track_event).with(:delete_tag)
destroy_tag('test.')
end
end end
end end
...@@ -134,6 +147,13 @@ describe Projects::Registry::TagsController do ...@@ -134,6 +147,13 @@ describe Projects::Registry::TagsController do
bulk_destroy_tags(tags) bulk_destroy_tags(tags)
end end
it 'tracks the event' do
expect_delete_tags(tags)
expect(Gitlab::Tracking).to receive(:event).with(anything, 'delete_tag_bulk', {})
bulk_destroy_tags(tags)
end
end end
end end
......
# frozen_string_literal: true
require 'spec_helper'
describe Gitlab::PagesClient do
subject { described_class }
describe '.token' do
it 'returns the token as it is on disk' do
pending 'add omnibus support for generating the secret file https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab/merge_requests/2466'
expect(subject.token).to eq(File.read('.gitlab_pages_secret'))
end
end
describe '.read_or_create_token' do
subject { described_class.read_or_create_token }
let(:token_path) { 'tmp/tests/gitlab-pages-secret' }
before do
allow(described_class).to receive(:token_path).and_return(token_path)
FileUtils.rm_f(token_path)
end
it 'uses the existing token file if it exists' do
secret = 'existing secret'
File.write(token_path, secret)
subject
expect(described_class.token).to eq(secret)
end
it 'creates one if none exists' do
pending 'add omnibus support for generating the secret file https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab/merge_requests/2466'
old_token = described_class.token
# sanity check
expect(File.exist?(token_path)).to eq(false)
subject
expect(described_class.token.bytesize).to eq(64)
expect(described_class.token).not_to eq(old_token)
end
end
describe '.write_token' do
let(:token_path) { 'tmp/tests/gitlab-pages-secret' }
before do
allow(described_class).to receive(:token_path).and_return(token_path)
FileUtils.rm_f(token_path)
end
it 'writes the secret' do
new_secret = 'hello new secret'
expect(File.exist?(token_path)).to eq(false)
described_class.send(:write_token, new_secret)
expect(File.read(token_path)).to eq(new_secret)
end
it 'does nothing if the file already exists' do
existing_secret = 'hello secret'
File.write(token_path, existing_secret)
described_class.send(:write_token, 'new secret')
expect(File.read(token_path)).to eq(existing_secret)
end
end
describe '.load_certificate' do
subject { described_class.load_certificate }
before do
allow(described_class).to receive(:config).and_return(config)
end
context 'with no certificate in the config' do
let(:config) { double(:config, certificate: '') }
it 'does not set @certificate' do
subject
expect(described_class.certificate).to be_nil
end
end
context 'with a certificate path in the config' do
let(:certificate_path) { 'tmp/tests/fake-certificate' }
let(:config) { double(:config, certificate: certificate_path) }
it 'sets @certificate' do
certificate_data = "--- BEGIN CERTIFICATE ---\nbla\n--- END CERTIFICATE ---\n"
File.write(certificate_path, certificate_data)
subject
expect(described_class.certificate).to eq(certificate_data)
end
end
end
describe '.request_kwargs' do
let(:token) { 'secret token' }
let(:auth_header) { 'Bearer c2VjcmV0IHRva2Vu' }
before do
allow(described_class).to receive(:token).and_return(token)
end
context 'without timeout' do
it { expect(subject.send(:request_kwargs, nil)[:metadata]['authorization']).to eq(auth_header) }
end
context 'with timeout' do
let(:timeout) { 1.second }
it 'still sets the authorization header' do
expect(subject.send(:request_kwargs, timeout)[:metadata]['authorization']).to eq(auth_header)
end
it 'sets a deadline value' do
now = Time.now
deadline = subject.send(:request_kwargs, timeout)[:deadline]
expect(deadline).to be_between(now, now + 2 * timeout)
end
end
end
describe '.stub' do
before do
allow(described_class).to receive(:address).and_return('unix:/foo/bar')
end
it { expect(subject.send(:stub, :health_check)).to be_a(Grpc::Health::V1::Health::Stub) }
end
describe '.address' do
subject { described_class.send(:address) }
before do
allow(described_class).to receive(:config).and_return(config)
end
context 'with a unix: address' do
let(:config) { double(:config, address: 'unix:/foo/bar') }
it { expect(subject).to eq('unix:/foo/bar') }
end
context 'with a tcp:// address' do
let(:config) { double(:config, address: 'tcp://localhost:1234') }
it { expect(subject).to eq('localhost:1234') }
end
end
describe '.grpc_creds' do
subject { described_class.send(:grpc_creds) }
before do
allow(described_class).to receive(:config).and_return(config)
end
context 'with a unix: address' do
let(:config) { double(:config, address: 'unix:/foo/bar') }
it { expect(subject).to eq(:this_channel_is_insecure) }
end
context 'with a tcp:// address' do
let(:config) { double(:config, address: 'tcp://localhost:1234') }
it { expect(subject).to be_a(GRPC::Core::ChannelCredentials) }
end
end
end
...@@ -175,6 +175,18 @@ describe Clusters::Applications::Prometheus do ...@@ -175,6 +175,18 @@ describe Clusters::Applications::Prometheus do
expect(subject).to be_rbac expect(subject).to be_rbac
end end
describe '#predelete' do
let(:knative) { create(:clusters_applications_knative, :updated ) }
let(:prometheus) { create(:clusters_applications_prometheus, cluster: knative.cluster) }
subject { prometheus.uninstall_command.predelete }
it 'deletes knative metrics' do
metrics_config = Clusters::Applications::Knative::METRICS_CONFIG
is_expected.to include("kubectl delete -f #{metrics_config} --ignore-not-found")
end
end
context 'on a non rbac enabled cluster' do context 'on a non rbac enabled cluster' do
before do before do
prometheus.cluster.platform_kubernetes.abac! prometheus.cluster.platform_kubernetes.abac!
......
...@@ -176,6 +176,44 @@ describe Ci::PipelinePresenter do ...@@ -176,6 +176,44 @@ describe Ci::PipelinePresenter do
end end
end end
describe '#all_related_merge_request_text' do
subject { presenter.all_related_merge_request_text }
context 'with zero related merge requests (branch pipeline)' do
it { is_expected.to eq('No related merge requests found.') }
end
context 'with one related merge request' do
let!(:mr_1) { create(:merge_request, project: project, source_project: project) }
it {
is_expected.to eq("1 related merge request: " \
"<a class=\"mr-iid\" href=\"#{merge_request_path(mr_1)}\">#{mr_1.to_reference} #{mr_1.title}</a>")
}
end
context 'with two related merge requests' do
let!(:mr_1) { create(:merge_request, project: project, source_project: project, target_branch: 'staging') }
let!(:mr_2) { create(:merge_request, project: project, source_project: project, target_branch: 'feature') }
it {
is_expected.to eq("2 related merge requests: " \
"<a class=\"mr-iid\" href=\"#{merge_request_path(mr_2)}\">#{mr_2.to_reference} #{mr_2.title}</a>, " \
"<a class=\"mr-iid\" href=\"#{merge_request_path(mr_1)}\">#{mr_1.to_reference} #{mr_1.title}</a>")
}
end
end
describe '#all_related_merge_requests' do
it 'memoizes the returned relation' do
query_count = ActiveRecord::QueryRecorder.new do
2.times { presenter.send(:all_related_merge_requests).count }
end.count
expect(query_count).to eq(1)
end
end
describe '#link_to_merge_request' do describe '#link_to_merge_request' do
subject { presenter.link_to_merge_request } subject { presenter.link_to_merge_request }
......
# frozen_string_literal: true
require 'spec_helper'
describe TestReportEntity do
let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, :with_test_reports) }
let(:entity) { described_class.new(pipeline.test_reports) }
describe '#as_json' do
subject(:as_json) { entity.as_json }
it 'contains the total time' do
expect(as_json).to include(:total_time)
end
it 'contains the counts' do
expect(as_json).to include(:total_count, :success_count, :failed_count, :skipped_count, :error_count)
end
it 'contains the test suites' do
expect(as_json).to include(:test_suites)
expect(as_json[:test_suites].count).to eq(1)
end
end
end
# frozen_string_literal: true
require 'spec_helper'
describe TestSuiteEntity do
let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, :with_test_reports) }
let(:entity) { described_class.new(pipeline.test_reports.test_suites.values.first) }
describe '#as_json' do
subject(:as_json) { entity.as_json }
it 'contains the suite name' do
expect(as_json).to include(:name)
end
it 'contains the total time' do
expect(as_json).to include(:total_time)
end
it 'contains the counts' do
expect(as_json).to include(:total_count, :success_count, :failed_count, :skipped_count, :error_count)
end
it 'contains the test cases' do
expect(as_json).to include(:test_cases)
expect(as_json[:test_cases].count).to eq(4)
end
end
end
...@@ -84,6 +84,22 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'a class that supports relative positioning' do ...@@ -84,6 +84,22 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'a class that supports relative positioning' do
expect(item1.relative_position).to be < item2.relative_position expect(item1.relative_position).to be < item2.relative_position
end end
context 'when there is no space' do
let(:item3) { create(factory, default_params) }
before do
item1.update(relative_position: 1000)
item2.update(relative_position: 1001)
item3.update(relative_position: 1002)
end
it 'moves items correctly' do
item3.move_before(item2)
expect(item3.relative_position).to be_between(item1.reload.relative_position, item2.reload.relative_position).exclusive
end
end
end end
describe '#move_after' do describe '#move_after' do
...@@ -94,6 +110,22 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'a class that supports relative positioning' do ...@@ -94,6 +110,22 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'a class that supports relative positioning' do
expect(item1.relative_position).to be > item2.relative_position expect(item1.relative_position).to be > item2.relative_position
end end
context 'when there is no space' do
let(:item3) { create(factory, default_params) }
before do
item1.update(relative_position: 1000)
item2.update(relative_position: 1001)
item3.update(relative_position: 1002)
end
it 'moves items correctly' do
item1.move_after(item2)
expect(item1.relative_position).to be_between(item2.reload.relative_position, item3.reload.relative_position).exclusive
end
end
end end
describe '#move_to_end' do describe '#move_to_end' do
...@@ -196,7 +228,7 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'a class that supports relative positioning' do ...@@ -196,7 +228,7 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'a class that supports relative positioning' do
new_item.move_between(item1, item2) new_item.move_between(item1, item2)
expect(new_item.relative_position).to be_between(item1.relative_position, item2.relative_position) expect(new_item.relative_position).to be_between(item1.relative_position, item2.relative_position).exclusive
end end
it 'uses rebalancing if there is no place' do it 'uses rebalancing if there is no place' do
...@@ -208,7 +240,7 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'a class that supports relative positioning' do ...@@ -208,7 +240,7 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'a class that supports relative positioning' do
new_item.move_between(item2, item3) new_item.move_between(item2, item3)
new_item.save! new_item.save!
expect(new_item.relative_position).to be_between(item2.relative_position, item3.relative_position) expect(new_item.relative_position).to be_between(item2.relative_position, item3.relative_position).exclusive
expect(item1.reload.relative_position).not_to eq(100) expect(item1.reload.relative_position).not_to eq(100)
end end
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment